| Parameter
| Rio-Haghen, parameters changed for 1 cylinder, changed source here
| cl-stirling-engine, tag GM4L23 | comment
|
| frequency | 50Hz = 1500RPM
|
| THeater | 1033K = 1400F = 760C
|
| Total dead volume.cm3
| 628 | 634 | Ok
|
| Min cold space
| 238 | 238 | Ok
|
| Max cold space
| 554 | 555 | Ok
|
| Min hot space
| 266 | 280 | Hot cap gap is treated differently
|
| Max hot space
| 643 | 658 | Hot cap gap is treated differently
|
| Regen dead volume
| 115 | 115 | Ok
|
| Windage loss, Heater
| 74 | 203 | This is bad, turbulent flow formulas must match
|
| Windage loss, Regen
| 1031 | 273 | I don't know the reason
|
| Windage loss, Cooler
| 476 | 241 | This is bad, turbulent flow formulas must match
|
| Pumping loss
| 559 | 0 | Not calculated in cl-stirling-engine
|
| Shuttle loss
| 581 | 723 | Different formulas and different geometry
|
| Average pressure
| 17.9 | 17.9 | Initial pressure in cl-stirling-engine was changed to fit.
|
| Min pressure
| 13.0 | 12.2 | May be caused by different definition of average.
|
| MaxPressure
| 23.9 | 23.5 | May be caused by non-isothermal character of heat exchangers or different volume laws
|
| Conduction loss
| 2420 | 1640 | Ad hoc vs formula, let it be ok as difference is 800W of heat only.
|
| Power,kW
| 41.8 | 43.9 | mismatch <10% . Real engine test gives 29.8kW (value for 1400,1500,2600) that is, 68% of cl-stirling-engine value
|
| Efficiency
| 54.4% | 40.4% | significant mismatch. Real engine test yields 31.2% brake efficiency, that is, 77% of cl-stirling-engine value
|